Friday, August 26, 2011

Modesty Forbids

I found the link to A Letter To Girls I Know (on Modesty) in a thread called Dear God, not another warning about modesty on the No Longer Qivering Forums. From the outset, this letter is puzzling. First of all, the title says "to girls I know". If the letter writer knows the "girls" to whom he has written, presumably he knows their addresses and can send them mail directly, but the letter is posted on a blog. This blog is not even the author's blog, but that of someone called "annawood". Perhaps annawood was one of the original recipients of the letter and was so impressed she asked to be allowed to post it. The letter says "girls", though, and annawood also blogs about her home and children, so it is very likely she's a woman, not a girl. Perhaps it was sent to a girl she knows and so came to her attention.  Some backstory would have been helpful.


The author, whom I can't call by name because "the author's name [was] removed at his request" apparently knows a lot of girls, too, because he starts out by saying 
There are two kinds of men: Godly men, and worldly men. What kind of man do you want? I’m betting most of you said “a Godly man.”
So how many "girls" does he know well enough to write letters to advising them about their clothing choices?  A dozen? If he knows them that well, why is he writing them letters at all? Why hasn't the subject come up in conversation? My impression is that the letter was not written to girls he knows at all, but, as with most open letters, it was written to women he barely knows or knows of, and who wouldn't solicit his advice on clothing anyway.  


The thesis of his letter is that to attract a Godly man, "girls" should dress modestly. No wait, they should avoid dressing immodestly. The author never actually gives examples of what counts as modest dress, but he dwells a lot on what counts as immodest dress:
A worldly man doesn’t control himself, rather, he looks at anything that attracts his attention or gets him excited. A worldly guy has no problem when girls wear clothes that show off skin, like boxers, high or low-cut shirts, low-rise jeans, and “cute” little swim-suits. He’s a fan of tight-fitting shirts and pants that show off your form, he thinks they’re fine! Worldly guy watches a lot of TV and R-rated movies, isn’t really offended by sexual content or nudity and secretly dabbles in pornography. He’s a “Christian” and makes up a significant portion of your church and youth group. He’s a really nice guy and sees you mainly for your body. If you were to marry worldly guy, he’d bring lots of baggage into the relationship, have intimacy problems, entertain thoughts of other women, and possibly cheat on you.
You know what I see when I read this paragraph? I see this going through our letter writer's mind:
A worldly man doesn’t control himself, rather, he looks at anything that attracts his attention or gets him excited. A worldly guy has no problem when girls wear clothes that show off skin, like boxers, high or low-cut shirts, low-rise jeans, and “cute” little swim-suits. He’s a fan of tight-fitting shirts and pants that show off your form, he thinks they’re fine! Worldly guy watches a lot of TV and R-rated movies, isn’t really offended by sexual content or nudity and secretly dabbles in pornography. He’s a “Christian” and makes up a significant portion of your church and youth group. He’s a really nice guy and sees you mainly for your body. If you were to marry worldly guy, he’d bring lots of baggage into the relationship, have intimacy problems, entertain thoughts of other women, and possibly cheat on you. 
Our author claims that, "When immodestly-dressed girls, magazine covers, or risqué advertisements come into view, Godly guy quickly 'bounces his eyes' away from the image", but even with all that eyeball bouncing, he has an amazing grasp of what immodest outfits a "girl" is likely to be wearing.


So what does he advise a woman, oh, pardon me, "girl" wear to appear modest?
Of course, I understand the desire to look stylish, attractive, and “cute.” It’s important to fit in and get attention. Trust me, it can be done modestly! 
By wearing what exactly? (Sound of crickets chirping) Oh, no, wait, he does suggest one possible outfit.
And you can forget about any guys missing out on how attractive you are because you don’t wear revealing clothing. You could wear a circus tent and we would still know; it’s a gift we have.
I'm not even sure where I'd buy a circus tent in my size, but then, I haven't been a girl since the mid-1960's, so maybe it doesn't matter.


I have to admit, I agree with the author's thesis that what you wear determines what kind of man you attract. The day I read this, I looked at what my husband was wearing and what I was wearing. We both had on jeans and T-shirts. Case closed.



3 comments:

  1. Wow, interesting critique. Okay, background info since I am Anna Wood: If you'd really wanted background, you could have asked me. Others have. : ) I found this letter on another ladies blog, talked to the writer and got permission to use it on my site. He himself asked me to remove his name from it because, initially, the letter really was written to some girls he knew and apparently one of them shared it around.

    God does call females (whether girls or women) to modesty. You don't have to agree with that, of course, but to fail to agree is to question God, not me, not the writer. As far as him not suggesting what kinds of outfits are both cute and modest I think any woman or girl who really wants to be modest and cares about how she looks won't have a problem deciding how to go about putting together a nice outfit. The rules for modest dressing are rather basic and simple: nothing too tight, nothing too short, nothing too low, nothing too sheer, nothing too high. Now, when we figure out what isn't appropriate, what is left is fine. If anyone needs suggestions and goes over to my site (The Cross Is All) and leaves me a message anywhere there, I will be glad to either answer them myself or pass it on to someone else for answering if that is what they desire.

    May God be glorified in all we do~ Anna

    ReplyDelete
  2. The "Letter to Girls I Know" is morally offensive and socially destructive. First, the letter's author has written an open letter to all women. This pretense of knowing girls is rubbish. The author wanted to avoid speaking to women in general, because it would highlight his abject misogyny. The letter states that women "don’t see the struggles, the pain, the tears and the sin that you cause." THAT.YOU.CAUSE. That WOMEN CAUSE ... by the way women dress. Women cause the sins of men. This, as opposed to the pain, tears, sin that men cause by choosing to cheat and sin. And how do these sin-causing immodest women dress? Boxers?? (is there some outbreak of boxer-clad women?) Cute little swimsuits?? (like what? bikinis okay? one piece?? how about a tankini??). And the unhelpful guidelines ... nothing tight, short, low, sheer, high ... which leads us to the critical part ... nothing that shows OUR FORM. Outrageous. I do not dress provocatively. Never have. But there is nothing inherently sinful or wrong with my body or the form of my body. Nudity is not inherently sinful, nor is my body an instrument of the Devil. My body is NOT an instrument of evil temptation. These concepts hurt men in making men think that they are victims of evil temptresses, instead of teaching men to face the world with respect and inner peace and to accept responsibility for their actions, rather than blaming women for the sins of men. It drives a wedge between men and women if men believe that women are nothing more than evil temptresses worthy of men's disapproval and disdain. The "Letter" states (to the "girls"), "you’ll never know how many broken relationships and lifestyles of sin you’ve contributed to simply by the way you dress." This focus on women CAUSING sin in men reduces women down to nothing more than walking torture devices for poor struggling men. It is reminiscent of the social engineering used in Islamist regimes, where women are relegated to wearing Burqas and face-veils, all under the guise of protecting the family. This oppression of women (under the guise of protecting men from the far-too-strong-to-be-resisted predatory sexuality of women) reduces women to little more than property to be controlled (lest their personal freedom to live life as they choose drive men to commit rampant sinning). Am I appalled at the way SOME women dress? Certainly. Am I in favor of modest dress? Absolutely. But, regardless of what women wear, women are not instruments of evil driving men to the brink of sinful insanity. To allow this sort of thinking degrades women and men alike ... women are walking temptations with predatory sexuality, and men are poor little weaklings, unable to resist the all-too-powerful allure of women in blue jeans. As for what kind of man I want ... I want a man who would NEVER shrug off his own personal responsibility and blame his failings on women's clothing or the lack thereof.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I will have to say that this is a very interesting conversation. Certainly worth thinking on.

    I don't think anyone is saying that men are weak or that women are the evil temptress. God created everything for our good and for our pleasure. It is the way that we choose to use it that makes it good or evil. We have complete freedom to make choices, but unfortunately we do not have the freedom to choose the consequences of those choices.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman's body or even nudity for that matter, provided that it is shown in the right context, within a marriage. When these things are even "flirted" with outside of marriage there are consequences.

    Modesty is a beautiful thing in it's true form. I'm not talking about the oppression of women, but I am talking about dressing in a way that attracts people to WHO you are, not WHAT you are. I see no need for a guideline of dress to be imposed on another adult woman. Her dress is totally personal choice. What is cute and modest on one woman may not be so on another.

    There is freedom, but there is also responsiblity. If you would like to read what God says about our freedoms and our choices, Romans chapter 14 would be a great place to start.

    Thanks for letting me chime in on this subject. It's a great debate.

    ReplyDelete